Removal of dead wood and dead trees - key threatening process listing
The Scientific Committee, established by the Threatened Species Conservation Act, has made a Final Determination to list Removal of dead wood and dead trees as a KEY THREATENING PROCESS in Schedule 3 of the Act. Listing of key threatening processes is provided for by Part 2 of the Act.
NSW Scientific Committee - final determination
The Scientific Committee has found that:
1. The accelerated and ongoing removal of standing dead trees and woody debris on the ground caused by human activity has been recognised as a factor contributing to loss of biological diversity (ANZECC 2001). Examples of the process include illegal or poorly regulated firewood collection from forests and woodlands and unsustainable loss of fallen woody debris, which may be stacked, burnt, mulched or otherwise removed from the site.
2. The removal of deadwood, either standing or fallen, can cause the broadscale change of woodlands into paddocks with isolated standing trees, with little natural understorey and no woody debris on the ground (Landsberg 2000). This may be done to remove obstacles to machinery, increase grazing access and productivity, reduce rabbit harbour and for aesthetic reasons. Local councils and other agencies also "tidy up" by removing dead wood and dead trees from their reserves and from along roadsides.
3. Fire wood collection generally involves removal of relatively undecayed fallen logs, but the repeated loss of this material from woodland sites will over the long term, reduce or eliminate the availability of old fallen logs as habitat. Removal of standing dead wood reduces the availability of hollows over time and the input of material to the litter layer. This process is exacerbated by the failure of regeneration of these plant communities and the resulting reduction in natural accumulation of dead wood.
In New South Wales, firewood includes mainly fallen timber but also comprises standing dead timber with Eucalyptus species including Boxes, Ironbarks and Stringybarks forming the bulk of the wood burned (CSIRO 2000, Wall 2000). Across Australia, over 80% of wood collected for firewood comes from private property.
4. The forests and woodlands of the Western Slopes and Tablelands are the ecological communities most threatened by dead wood removal because they contain popular firewood species. This region of NSW has been extensively cleared for agriculture and remnant patches of woodland are severely impacted by dead wood removal (Wall & Reid 1993). Removal of dead wood may also affect other forest communities, including wet sclerophyll forests and rainforests, particularly in small and easily accessible remnants.
5. In Australia about 290 vertebrate species use tree hollows (Smith & Lindenmayer 1988, Lindenmayer et al. 1991, Gibbons & Lindenmayer 1997), many on an obligate basis. Within NSW about 120 vertebrate species use tree hollows and most can utilise dead trees as nest sites (Gibbons & Lindenmayer 2002). In eucalypts the formation of hollows suitable for wildlife is very slow, taking between 120 and 200 years (Mackowski 1984, Stoneman et al. 1997). A number of studies have shown that the proportion of trees bearing hollows in eucalypt forests managed for wood production in NSW has substantially declined (Andrews et al. 1994, Kavanagh & Stanton 1998, Gibbons 1999, Gibbons & Lindenmayer 2002,). Recent studies of forests and woodlands of the western slopes of NSW have found that the number of trees large enough to contain hollows has declined dramatically and the proportion of standing dead trees has also been reduced (Paull 2001, P. Gibbons, pers comm.)
All public land areas managed for wood production in NSW have specific prescriptions and regulations that are intended to protect both standing dead trees and woody debris on the ground. Specifically, these regulations take the form of licences issued by the National Parks and Wildlife Service under the auspices of the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 or the National Parks and Wildlife Service Act 1974.
Dead standing trees in paddocks, resulting from clearing efforts or dieback, form a critical resource for threatened and non-threatened fauna (Law et al. 2000). The useful habitat life of these trees is limited by natural factors (decay, windthrow), purposeful destruction by further clearing, and use for firewood (Wall & Reid 1993). There are indications from current studies in NSW (P. Gibbons, pers. comm.) that the decline in the number and quality of dead standing trees is ongoing.
The presence of standing dead trees and woody debris is an important component of the structure of forest and woodland and helps determine the habitat value for a wide range of fauna (Knight & Fox 2000, MacNally et al. 2001).
6. Fallen dead wood provides important habitat for a suite of invertebrate species dependent on decaying wood for their survival. These species play an important role in recycling nutrients in forest and woodland ecosystems. They include a range of species that feed, breed, or shelter in dead wood or may be predators, or parasitoids dependent on species that live on dead wood. Fallen wood, which includes the bark, sapwood and heartwood, comes in a variety of shapes and sizes, permitting habitat specialisation with some species utilising only parts of the fallen wood, or even decaying logs with a particular exposure to sun. Microbial organisms and fungi are also important in the breakdown of timber (Araya 1993) and recycling of nutrients back into the soil. Invertebrates can also feed on, or in wood-decomposing fungi (Grove 2002).
7. Removal of dead old trees (either standing or on the ground) results in the loss of important habitat such as hollows and decaying wood (Gibbons & Lindenmayer 2002) for a wide variety of vertebrates, invertebrates and microbial species and may adversely affect the following threatened species:
Endangered Species | Preferred Habitat Type | |
Hoplocephalus bungaroides | Broad-headed Snake | Standing |
Neophema chrysogaster | Orange-bellied Parrot | Standing |
Polytelis anthopeplus monarchoides | Regent Parrot (eastern subspecies) | Standing |
Anomalopus mackayi | Five-clawed Worm-skink | On-ground |
Nurus atlas | (a beetle) | On-ground |
Nurus brevis | (a beetle) | On-ground |
Meridolum corneovirens | (a land snail) | On-ground |
Vulnerable Species | ||
Hoplocephalus bitorquatus | Pale-headed Snake | Standing |
Hoplocephalus stephensii | Stephens' Banded Snake | Standing |
Varanus rosenbergi | Rosenberg's Goanna | Standing |
Cacatua leadbeateri | Pink Cockatoo | Standing |
Calyptorhynchus magnificus | Red-tailed Black-cockatoo | Standing |
Calyptorhynchus lathami | Glossy Black-cockatoo | Standing |
Neophema pulchella | Turquoise Parrot | Standing |
Neophema splendida | Scarlet-chested Parrot | Standing |
Ninox connivens | Barking Owl | Standing |
Polytelis swainsonii | Superb Parrot | Standing |
Tyto novaehollandiae | Masked Owl | Standing |
Chalinolobus nigrogriseus | Hoary Wattled Bat | Standing |
Dasyurus maculatus | Spotted-tailed Quoll | Standing and on-ground |
Falsistrellus tasmaniensis | Eastern False Pipistrelle | Standing |
Mormopterus norfolkensis | Eastern Freetail-bat | Standing |
Petaurus norfolcensis | Squirrel Glider | Standing |
Phascogale tapoatafa | Brush-tailed Phascogale | Standing |
Litoria subglandulosa | Glandular Frog | On-ground |
Pseudophryne australis | Red-crowned Toadlet | On-ground |
Climacteris picumnus victoriae | Brown Treecreeper (eastern subspecies) | Standing and on-ground |
8. Removal of dead wood and dead trees and resultant loss of hollows has been identified as a threat that could cause species or populations that are not threatened to become threatened. Examples of species or populations of those species include:
Ground dwelling mammals such as:
Antechinus flavipes | Yellow-footed Antechinus |
Antechinus stuartii | Brown Antechinus |
Antechinus subtropicus | Subtropical Antechinus |
Rattus fuscipes | Bush Rat |
Sminthopsis murina | Common Dunnart |
Trichosurus vulpecula | Common Brushtail Possum |
Other hollow-dependent species include many of the parrot species (Garnett & Crowley 2000), ground-dwelling mammals (Dickman 1991), possums and gliders (Smith & Lindenmayer 1988) and the forest-dwelling insectivorous bats (Tidemann & Flavel 1987).
9. Removal of dead wood and dead trees may threaten insects which depend on dead wood and forest litter including Isoptera (termites, Whitford et al. 1992), some species of ants (Andrew et al. 2000), Collembola, Diplura (Heterojapyginae), Blattodea (cockroaches), Dermaptera (earwigs), Gryllacrididae (wood crickets), Diptera (Mycetophilidae, Tipulidae, Asilidae, Stratiomyidae, Dolichopodidae and Myididae), Hemiptera (Aradidae and Lygaeidae), and Lepidoptera (Cossidae and Lycaenidae). Coleoptera (beetles) are particularly vulnerable with many families having representatives that live in rotten wood, including Cerambycidae, Elateridae, Tenebrionidae, Passalidae, Scarabaeidae, Lucanidae, Buprestidae and Curculionidae. Many Carabidae, including endangered species Nurus brevis and Nurus atlas, eat saproxylic prey. Amongst non-insect invertebrates, the main group that is affected is the Onychophora (velvet worms), with many endemic species in temperate forests (Scott & Rowell 1991).
10. Removal of dead wood and dead trees may seriously affect the long term availability and viability of habitat. Loss of fallen dead wood from open forests and woodlands will increase impacts of wind on the soil microclimate. Loss of surface moisture resulting from the removal of dead wood will affect soil organisms below fallen logs as well as changing the above ground plant cover and will impact on associated invertebrates (Tongway & Ludwig 1996, Tongway et al. 1989 )
11. In view of the above the Scientific Committee is of the opinion that Removal of dead wood and dead trees adversely affects two or more threatened species, populations or ecological communities or could cause species or populations that are not threatened to become threatened.
Associate Professor Paul Adam
Chairperson
Scientific Committee
Proposed Gazettal date: 12/12/03
Exhibition period: 12/12/03 - 13/02/04
References:
ANZECC (2001) A national approach to firewood collection and use in Australia. A report prepared for the Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council. Department of Environment and Heritage: Canberra.
Andrew N, Rogerson L and York A (2000) Frequent fuel-reduction burning: the role of logs and associated leaf litter in the conservation of ant biodiversity. Austral Ecology 25, 99-107.
Andrews SP, Gration P, Quinn D and Smith AP (1994) Description and assessment of forestry impacts on the fauna of the Urbenville Forestry Management Area. Supporting Document No.4. Urbenville Management Area EIS. State Forests of NSW: Sydney.
Araya K (1993) Relationships between decay types of dead wood and occurrence of lucanid beetles (Coleoptera: Lucanidae). Applied Entomological Zoology 28, 27-33.
Bennett AF, Lumsden LF and Nicholls AO (1994) Tree hollows as a resource for wildlife in remnant woodlands: spatial and temporal patterns across the northern plains of Victoria, Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology 1, 222-35.
CSIRO (2000) Impact and use of Firewood in Australia. (eds. D. Driscoll, G. Milkovits & D. Freudenberger.) 62 pp. Report to Environment Australia. CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems: Canberra.
Dickman CR (1991) Use of trees by ground-dwelling mammals: implications for management. In Conservation of Australia's Forests Fauna. (ed. D. Lunney.) pp. 125-36. Royal Zoological Society of NSW: Mosman.
Garnett ST and Crowley GM (2000) The Action Plan for Australian Birds 2000. Environment Australia: Canberra.
Gibbons P (1999) Habitat-tree retention in wood production forests. PhD thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.
Gibbons P and Lindenmayer DB (1996) Issues associated with the retention of hollow-bearing trees within eucalypt forests managed for wood production. Forest Ecology and Management 83, 245-79.
Gibbons P and Lindenmayer DB (1997) Conserving hollow-dependent fauna in timber-production forests. NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service: Hurstville, N.S.W.
Gibbons P and Lindenmayer DB (2002) Tree hollows and wildlife conservation in Australia. CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.
Gibbons P, Lindenmayer DB, Barry SC and Tanton MT (2000) Hollow formation in eucalypts from temperate forests in southeastern Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology 6, 218-28.
Grove SJ (2002) Tree basal area and dead wood as surrogate indicators of saproxylic insect faunal integrity: a case study from the Australian lowland tropics. Ecological Indicators. In press.
Kavanagh RP and Stanton MA (1998) Nocturnal forest birds and arboreal marsupials of the south-western slopes of NSW. Australian Zoologist 30, 449-466.
Knight EH and Fox BJ (2000) Does habitat structure mediate the effects of forest fragmentation and human-induced disturbance on the abundance of Antechinus stuartii? Australian Journal of Zoology 48, 577-595.
Landsberg J (2000) Status of temperate woodlands in the Australian Capital Territory Region. In: Temperate eucalypt woodlands in Australia: biology conservation management and restoration. ed. by R. J. Hobbs & C. J. Yates, pp. 32-44. Surrey Beatty & Sons: Chipping Norton, Australia.Law, B.S., Chidel, M. and Turner, G. (2000). The use by wildlife of paddock trees in farmland. Pacific Conservation Biology 6, 130-143.
Lindenmayer DB, Cunningham RB, Tanton MT and Smith AP (1991) Characteristics of hollow-bearing trees occupied by arboreal marsupials in the montane ash forests of the central highlands of Victoria, south-east Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 40, 289-308.
Mackowski CM (1984) The ontogeny of hollows in Blackbutt, Eucalyptus pilularis and its relevance to the management of forests for possums, gliders and timber. In Possums and Gliders. (eds. A.P. Smith & I.D. Hume.) pp. 517-25. Surrey Beatty and Sons: Chipping Norton, Sydney.
MacNally R, Parkinson A, Horrocks G, Conole L and Tzaros C (2001) Relationships between terrestrial vertebrate diversity, abundance and availability of coarse woody debris on south-eastern Australian floodplains. Biological Conservation 99, 191-205.
Paull D (2001) Stump count analysis of the pre-european Pilliga forests. In Perfumed Pineries. Environmental history of Australia's Callitris forests. Ed. Dargavel, J., Hart, D. & Libbis, B. Pp 63-70. CRES:Canberra.
Scott IAW and Rowell DM (1991). Population biology of Euperipatoides leuckartii (Onychophora: Peripatopsidae). Australian Journal Zoology 39, 499-508.
Smith AP and Lindenmayer D (1988) Tree hollow requirements of Leadbeater's possum and other possums and gliders in timber production ash forests of the Victorian central highlands. Australian Wildlife Research 15, 347-62.
Stoneman GL, Rayner ME and Bradshaw FJ (1997) Size and age parameters of nest trees used by four species of parrot and one species of cockatoo in south-west Australia: a critique. Emu 97, 94-6.
Tidemann CR and Flavel SC (1987) Factors affecting choice of diurnal roost site by tree-hole bats (Microchiroptera) in south-eastern Australia. Australian Wildlife Research 14, 459-73.
Tongway DJ and Ludwig JA (1996) Rehabilitation of Semi-arid Landscapes in Australia. I. Restoring productive patches. Restoration Ecology 4, 388-397.
Tongway DJ, Ludwig JA and Whitford WG (1989) Mulga log mounds: fertile patches in the semi-arid woodlands of eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology 14, 263-268.
Wall J (2000) Fuelwood in Australia: impacts and opportunities. In: Temperate eucalypt woodlands in Australia: biology conservation management and restoration. (ed. by R. J. Hobbs & C. J. Yates), pp. 372-381. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton Australia
Wall JP and Reid N (1993). Domestic fuelwood use in a rural township in eastern Australia: evidence for resource depletion and implications for management. Commonwealth Forestry Review 72, 31-7.
Whitford WG, Ludwig JA and Noble JC (1992) The Importance of Subterranean Termites in Semi-Arid Ecosystems in South-Eastern Australia. Journal of Arid Environments 22, 87-92.